[REVIEW] Double Dragon IV

Double Dragon IV
Developer: Arc System Works (Guilty Gear, BlazBlue)
Publisher: Arc System Works
Available on: PS4 (reviewed), PC
Release date: January 30, 2017
Price: $6.99

Growing up in the NES generation, I played my fair share of Double Dragon. Whether alone or with friends, it was a series of games that I gravitated towards whenever I wanted a break from the labyrinthine map of Metroid, the open world of Zelda, or whatever cheap garbage Mike Tyson was pulling in Punch-Out. I’ve never put Double Dragon in the upper echelon of classic gaming, but for what it was it was just fine.

For better or worse, Double Dragon IV is essentially more of the same.

It doesn’t exist to make fun of itself in the way that Neon did, but the narrative is unapologetically corny nonetheless; not even taking into account the fourth entry takes place between the second and third. After emerging victorious in their previous endeavors against the Black Warriors, martial arts siblings Billy (Bimmy!) and Jimmy Lee have set up their Sōsetsuken dojos across the United States in hopes of spreading and maintaining the peace. How sweet. During a road trip out west, however, their vehicle is run off the road by a new group of evil doers called The Renegades and Marian, their version of Princess Peach, is kidnapped yet again. Her death in Double Dragon II never happened, I guess?


The story plays out between levels using basic storyboards with minimal wordsmithing, and it’s clearly not meant to be a selling a point. This is both an homage and continuation of the NES games, above all else.

Forgoing the series’ graphically superior arcade releases (and one awful fighting game) in favor of classic 8-bit sprites, Double Dragon IV uses many of the same characters and moves from Double Dragon II on NES. Billy and Jimmy, Abobo, and Roper are present and accounted for, along with wake-up knee strikes and jumping roundhouses.

Whether by accident or sheer developmental dedication, this brotherly beat-em-up feels like an honest to goodness NES game from the early 90’s. There’s static backdrops, screen tearing, and weird hit-boxes, along with equally cheap and dumb enemy AI. Just like the good ol’ days, most of the baddies can be manipulated and exploited using the same moves ad nauseum. Of course, they’ll also take it upon themselves to troll you atop ladders, near deadly pitfalls, or by congregating over your crippled body to strike like a pack of raptors, so it’s even Steven as far as I’m concerned.


There’s a decent variety of levels to punch and kick your way through, like a desert, a cave, and a casino, but none of them are necessarily standouts. Well, not for any good reasons anyway. One in particular, a factory level, features some aggravating platforming segments along moving beams. Behind the steel structure sits a stretched out image of a nighttime city view that looks like an old AOL-era JPG. Woof.

The story mode itself is quite short and should provide a decent challenge for anyone going solo. I didn’t find it to be particularly fun, however, offering a shallow NES experience that still lacks the depth of classic brethren like River City Ransom, or modern brawlers like Castle Crashers and Scott Pilgrim vs. the World: The Game. The same hordes of enemies flood the screen while you dish out the same cheap tactics to escape death time and time again, repeating as necessary. Within an hour I felt like I’d seen everything the game had to offer.

Everything is better with co-op, though, right? Unfortunately, that’s not much of a selling point for me, since it’s only offered locally or in one-hour increments via PS4’s Share Play. The lack of online co-op is a letdown, but for Double Dragon IV’s generous asking price, I wasn’t expecting it to be included.

There is a bit of replay value, though, by way of an endless Tower mode and the return of Versus mode. Tower mode is locked behind campaign progression, so you’re forced to muscle your way through the story before it opens up. Doing so unlocks the game’s enemies as playable characters, so completing levels always felt somewhat rewarding. The versus mode was a bit of a letdown since there’s no way to incorporate AI bots–you either play against your friends or you don’t play it at all.


Despite my wholly unenjoyable experience with Double Dragon IV, I get its appeal. It’s a classic throwback in every sense of the term and should easily please fans of the NES games unless it cracks your rose-tinted glasses instead. Games have grown up a lot since the original Double Dragon released in 1988, and taking the fourth entry’s antiquated visuals for granted I guess I didn’t expect it to feel as primitive as it looks.

I do admire Arc System Works’ attention to detail (assuming it wasn’t unintentional) regarding wonky hit-boxes, cheap enemy AI, reusing the old NES sprites, mastering the look and feel of the series, and enduring the never-ending hell of screen tearing. In the end, the fans that wanted a throwback to Double Dragon’s glory days got what they wanted. If you’re in that camp, I’m definitely happy for you. As someone who was never overly attached to the series, I just didn’t have a good time. At all.

Double Dragon IV isn’t the worst way to spend $7, but there are certainly better options out there.


So where’s the final score? There isn’t one. I spent a lot of time conveying my opinion in the above text, and I hope that’s worth more to you than some arbitrary number or a sequence of shaded-in star shapes. Basically, I’m not a fan of scores, so I no longer use them. Read the review and judge for yourself if the game is worth your time and money.

Full disclosure: This review was done using a PS4 copy of Double Dragon IV that was provided by the game’s publisher, Arc System Works. While I’m sometimes given games to review, I pride myself on providing unbiased reviews to fellow consumers, along with constructive feedback to hard working developers and publishers. Whether or not I pay for the game is completely irrelevant.


13 thoughts on “[REVIEW] Double Dragon IV

Add yours

  1. I enjoyed it for what it was, a nice send up of the NES Trilogy. I’m apparently one of the rare few who did like it, a lot of reviews have hammered it. I can’t say the criticism isn’t warranted, there are indeed portions that should have been improved upon. (Like giving PC users a FULL SCREEN tab for crying out loud>:/ ) But beyond that, I felt we were given what was advertised, an NES inspired sequel to the NES iteration of an arcade series.

    Anyway, great review!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah, I totally get that THAT’S what we were given. I’ve just never been too partial to the series, at least not to the point where I felt the game was even necessary. Long-time fans got what they wanted, and that’s always awesome.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. It has online play on PS4, but only through Share Play (which is only available in one-hour increments). Still, it’s something… I guess? It’s super cheap and if it sounds like something you’d enjoy, there are definitely worse ways to spend your $7.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Judging by what others have said about it, Double Dragon IV delivers exactly what someone would expect from a game bearing that brand. Unfortunately, I think that’s why it hasn’t fared so well with critics; it’s a game that seems to have ignored the medium’s evolution. A lot of beat ‘em ups likely haven’t fared well in hindsight due to their overly repetitive nature. There are exceptions, but there probably is a reason it fell by the wayside as the nineties came to a close. I myself didn’t grow up with beat ’em ups, so it’s a genre I never really understood.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I was more of a platformer/RPG guy growing up, so beat-em-ups only served as a distraction whenever I wanted something different (or had friends over). There are a few standouts I’ve enjoyed, like PS2’s heavily criticized The Bouncer, but it’s not a genre I’m emotionally invested in. Clearly I wasn’t their target market, despite my love of the NES era.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I purchased it for nostalgia despite reading a bunch of unfavorable reviews hoping it would be an okay game to play with my girlfriend who is not a gamer, but will play Scott Pilgrim, Castle Crashers and old NES games with me. We found it to be a little sub-par unfortunately and she wasn’t quite able to keep up, which is unfortunate because I would have liked to finish this game with her and I probably won’t be going back into it anytime soon. Great review.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Great review! I’ve only ever played the original Double Dragon, but I liked it. I’ve also enjoyed River City Ransom, Scott Pilgrim, and Castle Crashers, which I would agree are fairly deep in terms of gameplay beyond punches and kicks. Neon interested me but I ultimately didn’t pick it up. I’m glad this at least looks like an old-school DD game, though it’s a shame that you didn’t enjoy it.


  5. It always bums me out when there isn’t online play. Some vocal people champion couch co-op, but local multiplayer doesn’t mean you can’t also support online play too. If Sony can fix those restrictions with Share Play it would be neat if they eradicated the time limit.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: